Is Jacob De Jesus worth drafting in fantasy football?

Jacob De Jesus is a wide receiver for the Kansas City Chiefs. Jacob De Jesus is outside the public top five overall and top five at WR; the exact rest-of-season rank and projection are available only on the subscription board.

What team and position does Jacob De Jesus play?

Jacob De Jesus is a wide receiver for the Kansas City Chiefs.

← Fanademy

Jacob De Jesus

WRKansas City Chiefs

Updated Sep 1, 2026

33% season miss rate

Fantasy football questions

Is Jacob De Jesus worth drafting in fantasy football?: Jacob De Jesus is a wide receiver for the Kansas City Chiefs. Jacob De Jesus is outside the public top five overall and top five at WR; the exact rest-of-season rank and projection are available only on the subscription board.
What team and position does Jacob De Jesus play?: Jacob De Jesus is a wide receiver for the Kansas City Chiefs.

What a subscription adds for Jacob De Jesus

Projected fantasy points, week by week and rest of season
Overall and positional rank, ordered by value over replacement
Value over replacement — points above the last startable player at this position
Dynasty value, adjusted for age
PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring

Start with a free account — checkout in under a minute

No trial. Cancel any time.

Create account to checkout — $5/month or $40/year

An account is free and takes an email address; checkout follows immediately.

Latest

0 articles through Sep 9

Nothing has changed for this player in the recent reporting: no injury, no shift in his role, and no transaction involving him has been reported in the last 30 days. Treat his situation as settled, with the board below reflecting the most recent picture. This note refreshes daily and is replaced as soon as coverage appears.

News timeline

No article we collect names Jacob De Jesus. Articles are linked by exact full name. If a shared name cannot be resolved to one player who could plausibly appear in current coverage, we do not guess, so this can be a gap in our index rather than a gap in coverage.