Is Dane Key worth drafting in fantasy football?

Dane Key is a wide receiver for the Denver Broncos. Dane Key is outside the public top five overall and top five at WR; the exact rest-of-season rank and projection are available only on the subscription board.

What team and position does Dane Key play?

Dane Key is a wide receiver for the Denver Broncos.

← Fanademy

Dane Key

WRDenver Broncos

Updated Sep 1, 2026

Player

Age23Jul 1, 2003

Height6' 3"

Weight210 lb

CollegeNebraska

DraftUndrafted2026

33% season miss rate

Fantasy football questions

Is Dane Key worth drafting in fantasy football?: Dane Key is a wide receiver for the Denver Broncos. Dane Key is outside the public top five overall and top five at WR; the exact rest-of-season rank and projection are available only on the subscription board.
What team and position does Dane Key play?: Dane Key is a wide receiver for the Denver Broncos.

What a subscription adds for Dane Key

Projected fantasy points, week by week and rest of season
Overall and positional rank, ordered by value over replacement
Value over replacement — points above the last startable player at this position
Dynasty value, adjusted for age
PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring

Start with a free account — checkout in under a minute

No trial. Cancel any time.

Create account to checkout — $5/month or $40/year

An account is free and takes an email address; checkout follows immediately.

Latest

0 articles through Sep 9

Nothing has changed for this player in the recent reporting: no injury, no shift in his role, and no transaction involving him has been reported in the last 30 days. Treat his situation as settled, with the board below reflecting the most recent picture. This note refreshes daily and is replaced as soon as coverage appears.

News timeline

No article we collect names Dane Key. Articles are linked by exact full name. If a shared name cannot be resolved to one player who could plausibly appear in current coverage, we do not guess, so this can be a gap in our index rather than a gap in coverage.